Boston Bombers

Earlier this month tragedy struck at the Boston Marathon; Tax Day it was, and also Patriot's Day, a holiday celebrated in the state of Massachusetts.
For days the law enforcement agencies looked for the culprits, while the Murdoch press decided to become a backseat driver and virtually accuse an innocent high school student who happened to be wearing a backpack at the time; he also happened to have brown skin and be of Arab descent. BAGMAN he was called on the front page on the 18th. The New York Daily News took them to task the next day.
Poor kid had to have law enforcement escort him to school. I hope he sues the Post like Elton John did, and gets a similar settlement.
By the 19th it appeared that the cops had their suspects, two Central Asians who may be tied to Chechnyan groups. After a shootout in which a policeman was killed at MIT, and then one of the suspects killed by his own brother who was trying to flee the scene, the press took decided that was it.
However, there are some questions about men with backpacks who then 'lost' their backpacks, which are black - the FBI concluded that those used were so - while one of their current suspects has a white pack - and also is shown in the pictures in a deceptive way so as to make it appear he had ditched it when in fact he still had it on. So yes there are questions, and there may be answers, I am not crying conspiracy here; John McWhorter in the Daily News came out and bashed out the truth movement on the 18th, as usual, it was a hit piece with no names or dates or real facts. So he may take issue with this post, even though I am only asking questions and pointing out anamolies - this is a right guaranteed by the Constitution, the exercise of which helps to maintain free society.
Below I have posted the work of Tony Catalucci from Global Research:

Detonation

ByTony Cartalucci
Global Research, April 19, 2013
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/contractors-at-boston-marathon-stood-near-bomb-left-before-detonation/5332069


What appear to be private contractors, wearing unmarked, matching uniforms and operating an unmarked SUV affixed with communication equipment near the finish line of the Boston Marathon shortly after the bomb blasts – can be seen beforehand, standing and waiting just meters away from where the first bomb was detonated.
The contractor-types had moved away from the bomb’s location before it detonated, and could be seen just across the street using communication equipment and waiting for similar dressed and equipped individuals to show up after the blasts.

Image: An already widely distributed photo showing the contractor-types on the bottom left, just left of where the bomb was placed and detonated. The men are wearing matching, unmarked uniforms, large black bags, and appear to be waiting, separately, and “behind” the rest of the crowd. In the upper left corner, a wooden structure forming one half of a temporary photography “bridge” over the finish line can be seen and serves as a useful reference when establishing the contractor-types’ position in other photos. ….


Image: After the explosion, two of the contractors seen by the wall next to the bomb, appear across the street, both using communication equipment. This photo too has been distributed and enlarged many times across the Internet. (click to enlarge)
….


Image: An unmarked SUV with a considerable amount of communication gear on the roof appears, surrounded by identically dressed men. The vehicle parks near the bleachers. (click to enlarge)
….


Image: Event staff and contractors both above and below the bleachers begin tearing up the skirting and appear to be looking for something or retrieving something while casualties are still being treated and evacuated across the street. (click to enlarge)
….

The men, numbering between 6-8 then begin tearing up the skirting around temporary bleachers erected for the event, opposite the explosion, before taping it off. Then, what appears to be an FBI bomb squad truck pulls up directly behind the contractor-types’ SUV, with a woman clearly wearing the letters F.B.I. on her tactical vest emerging and speaking with the contractor-types. Together they disappear from the scene, leaving their vehicles behind.


Image: What appears to be an FBI bomb squad truck pulls in, with a woman wearing what is clearly the letters F.B.I. on her vest. She talks with two contractors while it appears a third is partially in the truck’s right-hand side. Also note that the area contractors and event staff tore up, is now taped off. (click to enlarge) ….


Image: The FBI truck and contractor SUV sit seemingly abandoned– neither the FBI agent, nor the contractors can be seen. What they did, or where they went remains so far, unknown. (click to enlarge) ….

It should be noted, that with the exception of the contractor-types, all other responders at the scene, including the FBI agent, can be clearly identified, from police to the fire department, to medics and even individuals wearing vests with “B.A.A. Physician” written on them. It should also be noted that no other uniformed individuals can be seen standing near the bomb site aside from the contractor-types.

These men were unidentified, professional contractors apparently augmenting public servants at the Boston Marathon, present before and after the bomb blasts in the direct vicinity of the incident. After the blasts, whether it was their intended function or not, they appeared to be searching for something under the bleachers before being joined by what appears to be the FBI bomb squad. The FBI and the city of Boston has so far categorically failed to provide any information on these highly suspicious individuals.

Questions That Must be Answered
Several questions must be answered by the FBI, leading the investigation on behalf of we, the American people. The first question is who these men were, with large, black bags in the direct vicinity of where a bomb would detonate, moving away before the blast, and appearing directly across the road afterward. Who hired them and what was their function? Why were they moving amongst the crowd in a semi-covert fashion when all other public servants present were wearing proper uniforms and clearly identified? Did police, firefighters, event organizers, and medics know these men were present and what they were doing?

Why did it appear that the FBI was fully aware of their presence, and in fact working with them, specifically with what looks like a bomb squad unit? Were these contractors specialists in explosives, and if so, what is the significance that at least two of them were spotted just meters from where the blast occurred?

Why These Questions Demand Answers
The checkered, frightening history (see: FBI’s History of Handing “Terror Suspects” Live Explosives) of the FBI’s involvement in fomenting false terror attacks, and even presiding over attacks that succeeded in maiming and killing innocent people, should call into question their presence or involvement at any public event, especially when seen associating with unidentified, semi-clandestine organizations that appear to be private contractors.

Private contractors as well, do not answer or work for the public, but rather the highest bidder. Private contractors, most notably Blackwater and its various incarnations have operated both domestically and abroad, committing obscene crimes and atrocities with seemingly absolute impunity. The term “defense contractor” is in fact a euphemism for mercenary, and has no place in a civilized, democratic world, no matter what their alleged mission statement may claim.

That both of these nefarious entities were present and cooperating in the direct vicinity of the Boston bombings, with at least two contractors standing just meters away from where the bomb actually went off, raises a number of possibilities and concerns. A drill may have been being conducted, though the FBI and city officials have denied this. Or, a threat may have been communicated to event organizers ahead of time, which prompted the inclusion of “auxiliary” security, though again, both the FBI and the city of Boston deny receiving any information prior to the bombings. Whichever contracting firm this may have been, may just have wanted to swindle Boston’s taxpayers for an easy payday, and coincidentally found itself in the middle of extraordinary circumstances.

However, alarming suspicion is raised when the FBI makes no mention of an organization it was clearly coordinating with, particularly in terms of bombs and explosives before and after the incident, considering the nature of the attack. When an already dubious organization attempts to obfuscate the facts of any given event, it is the right and responsibility of legitimate law enforcement, public representatives and the citizenry itself to demand and get answers. If we are not persistent, with the FBI’s bizarre behavior over the past few days, including inexplicably cancelled and suspiciously rushed press conferences, and now what appears to be a Hollywood ending for the case, we may never get those answers.
….

Note: Most images were taken from Flickr user HahaTango,the entire collection of 150 images from the Boston Marathon can be found here.

WAS AMY WINEHOUSE SECRETLY MURDERED BY MURDOCH?

Of course not. Sadly, she passed away at the tender age of 27 - as did Hendrix, Cobain and many other young talented musicians. And it will be no surprise if she died of the same causes...but the toxicology reports have so far been inconclusive, and the press awaits a final verdict. As well they should.

Many would not even wait for such results to figure out that some combination of ketamine, crack or other drugs put her cold in earth. She, unlike Sean Hoare, was not a whistleblower on a billionaire who may be a sick criminal with an axe to grind. She was her own worst enemy. So little mystery surrounds her demise. But as obvious as it seems to most that hers was drug induced, there is still the protocol to follow of waiting for test results and not jumping to conclusions. Someone could always have poisoned her or murdered her in some other way, or she could have died of some undetected illness. We wait for facts.

Except in the case of a man whose death was possibly beneficial for Murdoch...then we just jump to a neat little conclusion and we hear no more - even the New York Times is not giving us any more on this. Case closed. Nothing to see here folks. He was a junkie, as some of his fellow hacks told us, so there...

Personally I do not believe he was a junkie, he seemed too in control and also, that label comes from his enemies, not a series of rehab clinics. But even if he was, it would be proper to let the toxicology reports come in before any verdict. The failure to follow protocol in his case is in itself grounds for suspicion. And it stands in contrast to the Winehouse case, which the Murdoch press is now using to sell more of its papers. So at least she did not die in vain, whatever she did die of. Which, as I said, I suspect was the drugs. Rupert did not murder her.

MURDOCH AND HIS LIARS

Now that Murdoch is being subpoenaed to Parliament, his cronies people cannot seem to distance themselves fast enough. Citizen Kane never had it so bad. This makes Hearst look like an angel.

Rachel Brooks, his right had person, has finally managed to resign. The News of the World staff commented that it was for her they were sacrificed, hundreds jobs lost as she initially stayed on. But she must sense the ship is sinking. And she may go to jail. Along with Murdoch.

Here in the US the GOP is distancing itself, after they heard that he was trying to hack 9/11 victims. Now fancy that. The very press that tells us there is no conspiracy is out to commit conspiracy to spy on victims. Oh, that is not all they did - mark my words, Murdoch is a prime suspect in 9/11 along with his pressman Sun Myung Moon, whose weird 10 of September article on the front page of the Washington Times ought to have been a red flag to any Congressman - especially Peter King, who is on the Homeland Security Committee.

Nowadays, King is trying to get the FBI to look into Murdoch for his alleged or attempted hacking into 9/11 victims. Good try King, but don't stop there - continue to investigate who really did 9/11...

Which certain Murdoch pions do not want anyone doing, especially David Aaronovitch and Rachel North. The twain were paid lots of blood money to shout down the truthers, and now they seem to be hiding. Rachel, whose blog used to knock anyone bold enough to ask for the truth about 7/7 - whose victims Murdoch's people was also keen to hack - is not blogging anymore. The Murdoch-North relationship was close enough at one point for the FT to report the following:

'The tantalising prospect of an election battle between Rupert Murdoch and David Cameron mesmerised Westminster yesterday, before the media tycoon moved last night to kill off the idea.

The genesis of a "Sun versus the Tories" by-election was a 40th birthday party thrown for Rebekah Wade, the tabloid's editor, on Thursday night. The Sun, the principal media cheerleader for Gordon Brown's contentious 42-days detention proposals, was outraged by David Davis's resignation. A characteristically unrestrained leader in the tabloid yesterday, headlined "Crazy Davis", fulminated against the former shadow home secretary's "shabby act of treachery" and "petty grandstanding".

Ms Wade and her team had on Thursday afternoon already been discussing a cunning plan to convert this print attack into a full-blown campaign battle, by approaching Rachel North, one of the survivors of the July 7 bombings, to stand against Mr Davis.

As journalists and politicians - including senior Tories but not Mr Cameron - mingled and gossiped at Ms Wade's party, the idea gathered momentum. Mr Murdoch was among those captivated by the concept of a Sun campaign...'

And Aaronovitch is a favourite son in his opinion columns, after deserting the Guardian - which is the paper that blew the whistle on Murdoch. He has been debunked on the Jewish Chronicle blog site for his willingness to believe the official story but forth by the Third Reich about the Reichstag Fire.

It seems the press operates to hide the truth. And people like Aaronovitch and North like to get the easy money, along with thousands of scumbags who write lies. Hearst, Murdoch, Blair, Moon, just a few of the utter liars out there wasting out trees to write lies - but where are the journalists willing to speak up for the truth and write about issues such as hemp?

Few and far between.

That is why the public is so uninformed, and we have SUVs on the roads, high priced petrol, unemployment, war, etc. For Murdoch and Rachel North to make money. Both of them ought to be done for treason and imprisoned for life.

CITIZEN KANE

In the last two weeks, the world is realising what Murdoch really is. Sure, he denies knowing about hacking the Royal Family, hacking celebs, hacking into the phone of a missing-later-found-murdered 13-year-old, hacking the phones of 7/7 victims' families, hacking UK soldiers, trying to hack 9/11 victims' family members' phones, and lastly, following a detective around to help the two suspects in a murder case, one of whom is in jail for sexual crimes against a child - the list surely goes on - but do we believe him?

Do we believe he closed the News of the World for any other reason than to get his satellite deal through Parliament? Or that he did not just plan to open as the Sun on Sunday?

I have told people that he is a spy working for other intel agencies, that he got so big he is now basically working for himself, that he benefited from the strikes at the Times, which he bought cheap and cheapened - that he had a hand in the death of the Labour leader before Tony Blair, that he paid Tony Blair to sell Quinetic to Bush, that he ordered a stand-down on the publishing of any news about Ian Norris or US extradition, etc., etc., etc.

Now people are waking up. He was privy to deals at Downing Street and was not a UK citizen. He was a SPY and a THIEF, as I have called him on this site. Let him sue me. I have information on his org that I am not disclosing yet, and some I have but have been rudely sidelined.

So now I am seeing some vindication, but he is moving to control the damage, and there is hell of a lot going on that may occasion the deaths of some MPs etc. Remember who a pal of David Cameron mysteriously died just before this scandal broke? More to come...

And as to why he wanted 7/7 and 9/11 families' phones hacked, you have to realise those were inside jobs done in part by his allies. They wanted to see if anyone close to the attacks had any clues.

But the Murdoch press is not alone in that regard, let us not forget Jane Standley of the BBC who told us at 5pm EST that Building 7 had fallen...it had not. It fell 20 minutes later. The BBC girl was then whisked out of sight, I personally called them in London and was told they were not putting her forward...it was not wise they said. Not wise.

Then there is the Guardian. The what? The Guardian, which broke the story about Murdoch and his crew? Yes. Remember good old George Monbiot and his attacks on the 9/11 truthers? Well, he was almost one of us - he wondered out loud if the FBI did not do the anthrax attacks...too loud he was, and he suddenly reversed himself. Did he get close to the truth and get told to shut up, or did he use it as blackmail?

And when it came to the Ian Norris case, which is one of the most embarrassing cases in UK history - an innocent Brit sent to jail in the US for committing LEGAL acts - and the UK Parliament and police, their strings pulled by Murdoch, do nothing...

I will not shut up. These newspaper barons need to end their lives in jail. They are criminal jerks. They are the cause of many wars, and the reasons facts about things like hemp are suppressed.

Here in NY we have a Murdoch paper, the New York Post. I am going to call advertisers to tell them to withdraw advertising. Join me. It will put a dent in the Murdoch Beast. It will teach a lesson to journalists like Andrea Peyser who support DDT but do not tell you the truth about hemp, or much of anything for that matter. Just like Hearst. And Sun Myung Moon. And, yes, the Guardian and others nipping at Murdoch's heels for the wrong reasons - to get their own piece of the pie. I noted that Murdoch suppressed the story about Ian Norris being whisked away illegally to the US - but the Independent did the same, with the story taken out at the last minute after Genevieve Roberts had written it up. This is their shame too, lest they try to look good calling the kettle black at this time.