Environmentalist Ian Henshall to speak in London

While some would stifle all debate about the Boston bombings, or all such attacks,
as was the custom in Rome, just blame it on the Christians Nero said, there are those who look beyond the official story. Not that it may be otherwise. But since too many questions exist, we need to seek answers, and this week there will be an excellent forum for that in London with fellow environmentalist Ian Henshall, who has already written two great books with questions about 9/11 and the anthrax attacks - which were, as many claimed - US made attacks and NOT jihadi terror; the FBI, after years of listening to us, finally agreed, but then pinned the blame on a dead man in an attempt to quash further questions.



Newsflash: Tuesday's meeting to include Boston Bomb Analysis
Conway Hall, London WC1 4RL

Tuesday 30 April, 6.30pm to 9.30 pm

Entrance £4 unwaged £2. Full price tickets in advance £3 atwww.coffee.uk.com/tickets. Light refreshments.

For main programme see attached PDF. Lots on Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Spanish airline pilot and truth activist Mitoa Edjang presentation on why the pilots accused of the 9/11 attacks did not have the necessary skills.

NEW ADDITION

Investigative journalist David Southwell, documentary maker Tom Secker, 911 best selling author Ian Henshall
Boston: the Unanswered Questions
It's too soon to be sure what the real story of the Boston bombs will turn out to be but already the unanswered questions cast a sinister light on the official story.

The paper trail is suspicious. The accused Tsarnaev brothers turn out to have been well known to the FBI. The alleged instigator Misha, who should also be known to the FBI, has vanished and been removed from the official narrative. Elder brother Tamerlan was allegedly working with a CIA front organisation in Georgia in the Caucasus. The parents and a last Facebook message fro younger brother Dzhokhar claim the brothers were "set up" by the FBI. People who know them do not believe the official story (except the uncle, a wheeler dealer with close CIA links).

The claimed facts appear to be wrong. A picture appears to show Tamerlan naked and under arrest. How did he end up dead? Dzhokhar had no weapon so how was he shot in the throat in a firefight?

Why was Boston put under virtual marshal law? This is not the normal response to suspected killers on the loose. Who was the alleged carjack victim and who supplied the guns and bombs which the brothers do not seem to have had access to earlier?

Why did President Obama, a trained lawyer, pronounce the suspects guilty in flagrant contempt of the rule of law? Was this linked to of the openly expressed FBI demands on the media to suppress photos contradicting the official story?

Why do pictures show that the second suspect Dzhokharhad a white rucksack when the bombs were apparently in a black rucksacks? Why have the FBI failed to supply any photographs showing that either suspect left a rucksack behind.

Why were the original suspects exonerated, one deported to Saudi Arabia and one found dead, and why did Obama made an unscheduled meeting with the Saudi Foreign Minister?

What was the exact role of the many contractors with black rucksacks pictured around the bombed area? Was there an anti-terror drill going on as one eyewitness reported?

_______________________________________________ Reinvestigate911-l mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/reinvestigate911-l To unsubscribe, email reinvestigate911-l-unsubscribe@reinvestigate911.org

FRESH REVELATIONS MAY FINISH MURDOCH

Yesterday it emerged that the Murdoch gang had given a cell phone to Sara Payne, whose daughter was killed by a paedophile in 2000...Mrs. Payne loved the Murdoch papers and supported them till the end...when she found out that the gift of the phone was a Trojan Horse, bugged so the paper could listen in. To what? Their grief? Or, since the Murdoch empire is now known to support paedophiles who are under investigation, were they trying to support the murderer of this child? They went so far once as to bug the phone of a detective on a murder case who was surveilling someone who worked for the Murdochs...and who is now in jail.

What the hell is going on?

The Post in New York is not selling; yesterday the deli on my block threw away almost all the copies they got. El Diario sold out, but the Post was left to remainder.

And no wonder. It carries little or no information on this. Instead, it had some stupid article about drug dealers busted in Harlem, with the caption HEMP SHIRT - no, the shirt was made of cotton, as all stupid drug dealers wear, but the editor saw fit to carry on the Hearst tradition and smear hemp along with marijuana in the paper (Laura Italiano, "Busted in High Fashion, NY Post, 29 July 2011).

Let us take a long look at this scenario, and reflect on what is going on. A billionaire gives the public smelly garbage as news and the public eats it up. Thus we have wars and pollution, some of the latter from the process of making newspaper pulp. Which, like drug dealers' shirts, is not made from hemp.

Some of the smelliest garbage the Muroch people foisted on us was the Rachel North attacks on those questioning 9/11 and 7/7. And it stunk. She made good money from it all, jetsetting off to expensive hotels in Spain from which she blogged about the wines she enjoyed...and it was clever, as she was a woman who was claiming to be a victim - St Rachel the Martyr, dare question her and she could use the force of Murdoch to bring you down...I more than questioned her, to her face, which she claimed was hit by up to 40 pieces of shrapnel in the attacks - but shows no scars. She did not like the scrutiny and made sure to avoid me.

Just like a number of Murdoch journalists over the years when I have confronted them. They stink. They are part of an empire that has committed the most vile of acts and needs to be questioned about their role in 9/11, 7/7, and 3/11...which, besides being 911 days after 9/11,. just happens to fall on the birthday of one Keith Rupert Murdoch...was he celebrating as the bombs went off? We would like to know.

And we would like to close his papers and stop felling trees to produce the smelly garbage he calles news. But he is not alone - even the Guardian, which is at the fore of the exposure of his sins, has its own: for instance, it spiked the stories by investigative journalists Michael Gillard and Laurie Flynne who were investigating Scotland Yard back in 1999 and 2000. They finally published their shocking book Untouchables, Dirty Cops, Bent Justice and Racism in Scotland Yard in 2004.

One might just ask, was the Guardian also in bed with the Yardies? And what role did the Yard have in covering up 7/7 - which they must have known was an inside job? Or the sale of Quinetic, a story that the Guardian did not want to take from me? Or the extradition of Ian Norris - which had disgusting ties to the Bush Empire (which has disgusting ties to the Murdoch Empire...) - the Guardian spiked that one big time...

We may one day have to arrest and question about 30% of all journalists in the UK because this just cannot go on anymore. And I say 'we' because it looks like the Yard is also not doing its job.

KEITH RUPERT MURDOCH: 9/11 MASTERMIND?

Is Murdoch behind 9/11? Many are now asking this - with perhaps only some anecdotal evidence in the public domain - such as the allegation that News Corp tried to hack 9/11 victims' phones - to get info on anyone, like William Rodriguez, who saw anything suspicious? The Murdoch press, including the likes of DDT loving Andrea Peyser, love to mock 9/11 truthers...one goes so far as to write a book on it - David Aaronovitch - a review was posted on this site in spring of 2009.

Murdoch seems to be clearly trying to marginalize independent researchers who use facts to challenge the government’s flawed explanation of what occurred on 9/11. Why?

DID RUPERT MURDOCH
HAVE PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF 9/11?

More than a year before 9/11, media mogul Rupert Murdoch produced a television program that depicted a passenger aircraft being hijacked by remote control and flown into the World Trade Center. Murdoch has close and long-standing relations with the individuals who gained control of the twin towers shortly before they were destroyed.

Murdoch is said to be television’s “most powerful man in the world with the capacity to reach more than 110 million viewers across four continents.” Murdoch sits at the helm of News Corp., the parent company of Fox News network, and controls a large part of the mass media in the United States, including The New York Post and the Fox cinema and television network.

Murdoch’s international media network owns more than 175 newspapers and magazines on three continents, publishes 40 million papers a week and dominates the newspaper markets in Britain, Australia and New Zealand.

Less well known, however, is the fact that Murdoch produced a television program in 2000, which predicted with uncanny accuracy the attacks of 9/11.

Murdoch also has long-standing relationships with the key individuals who gained possession of the World Trade Center shortly before 9/11 – and who profited from its destruction.

In 2000, Murdoch produced a television program about a terror attack on the World Trade Center, which predicted precisely the kind of attack that occurred on 9/11. He is also closely connected to the two individuals who leased, and then insured the WTC property – and their future earnings – against precisely such an attack.

These connections and circumstances suggest that Murdoch had a considerable degree of prior knowledge of the attacks on the World Trade Center.

Repeated calls to Murdoch’s office by American Free Press to inquire about what he may have known or suspected about the possibility of such an attack were not returned.

THE LONE GUNMAN

On March 4, 2001, Fox TV, a branch of Murdoch’s media empire, broadcast the pilot episode of a “spin-off” series based on characters from the popular Fox program “X-Files”. The short-lived series was called “The Lone Gunman.”

A Murdoch-owned company called Canadian Millennium Productions, Ltd. (News Corp. owns 83 percent), produced the pilot episode for “The Lone Gunman” in Vancouver, Canada, and New York City from March 20 to April 7, 2000.

The title “The Lone Gunman” refers to a Washington-based government watchdog news weekly, not unlike the court-killed SPOTLIGHT and the American Free Press. The show’s main characters are the investigative reporters who produce the paper.

The pilot episode of “The Lone Gunman” depicted the hijacking of a passenger aircraft by a hostile computer hacker who takes control of the plane computer flight system and directs it to fly into one of the towers of the World Trade Center.

The climactic sequence shows the plane heading straight for one of the twin towers, but thanks to the efforts of the crew of “The Lone Gunman” and the powerful “Octium” computer chip, the pilots are able to regain control of the plane at the last second and avoid the building by inches.

The pilots do not swerve away from the tower but pull the plane up in a steep climb. In a memorable scene full of suspense the plane narrowly missed the tower.

The background footage for the plane’s approach to the WTC was actually filmed during the spring of 2000 by a special aerial crew that used a helicopter flying low over Manhattan on a night flight toward the twin towers.

Despite the uncanny similarities between the Murdoch-produced film and the horrific reality of 9/11, rather than being discussed in the media as a prescient warning of the possibility of such an attack, the pilot episode of “The Lone Gunman” series seemed to have been quietly forgotten.

While an estimated 13.2 million Fox TV viewers are reported to have watched the pilot episode of “The Lone Gunman”, broadcast on March 4, 2001, when life imitated art just six months later on 9/11, no one in the media seemed to recall the program.

NO ONE NOTICED

“I woke up on September 11 and saw it on TV and the first thing I thought of was The Lone Gunmen,” Frank Spotnitz, one of the program’s four executive producers said. “But then in the weeks and months that followed, almost no one noticed the connection.”

Frank Spotnitz, John Shiban, Vince Gilligan, and Chris Carter are listed as executive producers of the program. Shiban is also listed as a writer and creator of the pilot episode.

“What’s disturbing about it to me is, you think as a fiction writer that if you can imagine this scenario, then the people in power in the government who are there to imagine disaster scenarios can imagine it, too,” Spotnitz said.

Robert McLachlan, director of photography, received an award from the Canadian Society of Cinematographers on March 31, 2001 for his camera work on the pilot episode.

“It was odd that nobody referenced it,” McLachlan told American Free Press about the uncanny similarities between “The Lone Gunman” pilot episode he filmed and the horrific reality of 9/11. “You’re the first person who mentioned it,” he said. “In the ensuing press nobody mentioned that [9/11] echoed something that had been seen before.”

AFP asked McLachlan about who supervised the production of the pilot program. “John Shiban was primarily the creator,” McLachlan said, adding, “Chris Carter was not there.” Carter is well known for his production of the “X-Files.”

“It’s their baby,” Carter said earlier about “The Lone Gunmen.” Carter reportedly had “a minor part” in the production. Neither Carter nor Shiban could be reached for comment.

The young Keith Rupert was educated at Australia’s fashionable Geelong private school, and went on to the elitist and aristocratic Oxford University in England, according to Candour (UK) magazine.

It is through a network of organisations, in which Murdoch plays a central role, that Murdoch is connected to the individuals who arranged the privatization – and obtained control of the World Trade Center – shortly before its destruction.

These key individuals are: Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy, the lease holders of dubious repute who gained control of the WTC property six weeks before 9/11, and Port Authority Chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg, who authorised the transfer of the leases.

Murdoch belongs to, and has been honored by, a number of l organisations in which Silverstein, Lowy, and Eisenberg all hold senior positions. 50 days before 9/11, Silverstein Properties and Lowy’s Westfield America secured 99-year leases on the WTC. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey turned control of the World Trade Center over to the private hands of Silverstein and Lowy on July 24, 2001.

Silverstein and Lowy then took control of the 10.6 million-square-foot complex, which included the twin towers office buildings and two nine-story office buildings. Silvestein and Lowy then controlled all access to the World Trade Center. Lowy leased the shopping concourse called the Mall at the World Trade Center, which comprised about 427,000 square feet of retail space.

“Six weeks before the WTC towers were destroyed, the Port Authority completed the process of leasing them for 99 years to Larry Silverstein, the developer who had built 7 World Trade Center [which mysteriously self-demolished at 5:25 p.m. on 9/11].

“Simultaneously, the retail space underneath the complex was leased to Westfield America, the US division of an Australian company that is one of the world’s largest operators of shopping malls.” Paul Goldberger wrote in New Yorker, May 20, 2002.

“Silverstein and Westfield were given the right to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed, and Westfield has the right to expand the retail space by 30 percent,” Goldberger wrote.

Silverstein sued for some $7.2 billion in insurance money for the loss of the destroyed World Trade Center – and his expected earnings – for property he had leased with a down payment of $100 million – of borrowed funds.

Eisenberg in his role with the Port Authority was the key person who negotiated the 99-year leases for Silverstein and Frank Lowy’s Westfield America, who were in fact the low-bidders for the lease on the 110-story towers and the retail mall.

Murdoch and the Czechoslovakian-born Frank Lowy, who emigrated to Australia in the 1950s, have had a long friendship, which Murdoch recounted during an American Australian Association fund-raising dinner in honor of Frank’s son, Peter S. Lowy, in New York on November 20, 2002. Larry Silverstein and his wife also attended the American Australian event.

Some reporters refer to the American Australian Association, whose membership includes James Wolfensohn, the president of the World Bank, who raised cash for Rupert Murdoch when he first expanded into the United States, as “the kangaroo mafia.”

That's not to make any connection to Australia, or any other country or group to which Murdoch belongs (or belonged, he lost his Australian citizenship when he opportustically took US citizenship). Interestingly, I was once a member - for the reason that they threw wonderful parties at Rock Center here in NY last Friday of every month...

But to bet back to the man in question, we have a real problem on our hands. And is his ship sinks, it will be more than just one dead journalists in Herts who turns up dead. The real perps of 9/11 are not about to let themselves get found out. Stay tuned for more, there is lots to this...

SHINING A LIGHT ON 9/11 TRUTH ON 9/11

Last night was 9/11, and I spent the day with the truthers downtown. We all stayed away from the crazies who want to burn Korans or hate other groups. We got attacked a couple times, the police restrained a young man with a flag who turned on us and also a Fire Department crazy who actually jumped the metal barricades to scuffle with us and the police.

One crazy took a more intellectual approach and had a flier typed up saying that William Rodriguez was in Harlem smoking crack rather than saving lives in the North Tower. Revisionist history appears all the time. People believe what they want to believe...

Met up with DJ Greenarrow and his mate Jazz and from there it went rather well. It was hot, but cool breezes set in and the evening was perfect weather with clear skies; which was perfect for the plan to illuminate the sky with a third beam of light, in recognition of WTC7, which fell at 5:20pm EST on the day....funny, but at 5:00pm on the day, Jane Standley of the BBC stood outside it and read the script too early, telling the world that it had fallen due to weak supports! Foolish woman - it actually had very strong supports as it was built to be changed to accamodate clients who wanted tall ceiling or atriums.

Architect Richard Gage, who heads up a group of over 1,000 architects and engineers, held a press conference at 2pm outside the new Building 7...as usual, the press in NY wants to hear the lies, and certainly does not want to be reminded that the press had inside information about what was going on that day.

The city shines two beams of light into the sky to commemorate the attacks on this day, but conveniently omits the third...maybe because the general public would start asking questions about why the press knew that this building, which was not hit by a plane, fell, and at freefall speed (7 seconds for 47 stories) at that...

Barbara Honegger and Gage decided to set the record straight and rigged up a truck with light at the corner of Worth and W B'way. It went on at 9:11 pm EST, just at the others did...passersby stopped and questioned, and were surprised to even hear there had been a third building to fall...except for one astute child, who answered the gaping adults with the facts about Building 7.

A few blocks north on Walker Street there was a conference with the likes of Wayne Madsen in attendance; Cynthia McKinney was to speak, and I had a nice chat with her before she went on...also saw, walking just outside MI5 bar of all places, Annie Machon, the former desk clerk at MI5 who joined forces with David Shayler and Belinda McKenzie...Shayler is going around now wearing a diaper, calling himself Dolores and claiming to be the Messiah. Nice stunt, quite likely an idea proposed by the intel agencies bent on destroying the movement; it is now on record that White House propaganda minister Cass Sunstein had them infiltrated with Obama's permission...

But the truth shines on...whether as a beam in the sky in NY, or just as the truth. Government agencies, lazy journalists and crazies like Shayler and his crew will not make it go away. 9/11 was an inside job, as was the anthrax, 3/11, and 7/7.

BELOW IS THE PRESS RELEASE ABOUT THE THIRD LIGHT:

1,280 Architects and Engineers Launch

Third Light Beam into NYC Night Skyline

on 9th Anniversary of September 11th

Represents WTC Bldg 7’s still-officially-unexplained

free fall collapse and explosive implications

NEW YORK CITY, Sept. 11 – At 9:11 p.m. on the 9th anniversary of the September attacks, the members of the 1,280-strong Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) lit up the skies over Manhattan with a towering 2-billion-candlepower beam of light to raise public awareness that three, not just two, World Trade Center high-rise buildings collapsed symmetrically at near free-fall acceleration on 9/11, though only two were hit by planes. Three Beams image at www.ae911truth.org, main page upper left.

‘Why is there a Third Beam in my skyline?” New Yorkers are asking themselves tonight.

AE911Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA, answered that question earlier in the day at a 2:00 press conference in front of the entrance to the now-rebuilt WTC 7 where he was joined by 9/11 victims’ family members, members of NYC CAN (New York City Coalition for Accountability Now) and an audience of hundreds of concerned citizens from NYC and across the country.

“The people of New York need to see the light that a third WTC skyscraper not hit by any plane was destroyed on Sept. 11th and that they have been deceived about what happened on that

terrible day,” he said. “Tonight we are shining the spotlight, literally, on the fact that the official story of what happened at Ground Zero simply cannot be true and that a new, truly independent investigation is needed. This new investigation is needed both as a matter of national security and as the key to real justice for the victims of the Twin Towers.”

“So look into the NYC evening skyline tonight at 9:11 and ask yourself this question: “What can I do to shine a light of truth and justice for the family members and first responders?”

Gage is in NYC Sept. 11 and 12 to speak at a live-streamed symposium on “How the World Changed After 9/11.” This event at INN World Report, 56 Walker Street, Lower Manhattan, features national and international leaders of the 9/11 Truth and accountability movement.

“Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth are here to give any and all press and media all the technical support you need in order to break this story of the crime of the century,” Gage said. “The real story is not about the Islamic Cultural Center, which is a red herring fed to the media to keep New Yorkers emotionally occupied while the crime of the century -- the explosive demolition of three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11 -- goes almost completely unquestioned.”

“Building 7 is a smoking gun of the WTC crime scene. We hope that after tonight, New Yorkers will realize this and see what happened here on September 11th in a whole new light.”

Contact Richard Gage, AIA, AE 410 499-5403 rgage@ae911truth.org Formatted: Font: (Default)Georgia, 18 pt, Complex ScriptFont: ArialFormatted: Font: (Default)Georgia, 18 pt, Complex ScriptFont: ArialManny Badillo, NYCCAN 917 805-8080 mrbadillo@yahoo.com INN Symposium (206) 338-0319 www.liveonlocation.tv/

DEVIL IN THE DETAILS

Image right was sent to me by the actor Mike Stranger. It is an obscure photo of the face of satan in the WTC, which I remember hearing about as an image captured by a Philadelphia paper, but have not seen till today. So here it is.

One wonders who else was in the picture that we do not see, I mean, why where there explosions in the building BEFORE a plane ever hit? That fact is well known as it caused Felipe David to be taken to hospital after being rescued by William Rodriguez just before the first plane hit the North Tower. After 13 weeks in a coma, David woke up to remember his rescuer, who was by now famous for saving hundreds of others. Rodriguez spent two years talking to the government about what he saw, including further explosions in the tower. When he realised he was being ignored and that the whole damn thing was a whitewash, he went public. Ever since people have been realising that it was an inside job. Except, of course, for people like Homeland Security. But now maybe they can get the facts, as they trawl this site on occasion, so let's hope they catch on. Yesterday they highlighted the words "department" and "security", and got lots of off topic posts, so I am formulating this one for them to read. What else to they do all day? Where is bin Laden? How many billions are spent on these spooks to read obscure hemp sites run by sarcastic iconoclasts with no criminal record and no criminal intent, when they ought to be finding the people who really did 9/11 - hint, the evidence points to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, where the face of one of the inhabitants' does bear a resemblance to the one above.

KEY EVIDENCE

The face in the photo may be familiar to many, as it is that of William Rodriguez, the last man out of the WTC on 9/11. He was in the position to be the first, but ran back in to unlock crucial fire doors with his master key. The other 4 people with this key buggered off and no one knows their names to this day.

He was made a hero for saving hundreds of lives, but when the US government heard his eyewitness accounts of explosions in the buildings, they turned their back on him and be became homeless, after 19 years' work in the complex. Hundreds of others backed his story up however, including many NYC firefighters. Scientific analysis of the amazing way in which the towers fell, including Tower 7 which was not hit by a plane, shows that there was a weakening of the structres lower down and that it was not due to aviation fuel burning at the top. Seismograph records show this quite clearly, and the video footage taken by Rick Siegel from the New Jersey shore corraborate this as well.

Since 2004 he has done four speaking tours of the UK, and always elicits a reaction. Some in the press shun him because they cannot argue with him, so they sit back and take silly pot shots at him and other 9/11 survivors who can talk first hand about what really happened, not what the press thinks they ought to tell us. The BBC, for instance, told us about the collapse of Tower 7 20 MINUTES BEFORE IT HAPPENED! How did they just happen to know? They rambled on about it being a weak building when in fact it was doubly reinforced so as to facilitate joining floors for large commercial tenants. Much as one would like to see any of these silly reporters going face to face, man to man with Rodriguez, this isn't going to happen. Johann Hari, George Monbiot and their ilk are safely esconced behind a desk in Pressland.

Rodriguez, on the other hand, shows his face and stands by what he says. He will be saying it on Monday, 9 July, at the Indian YMCA in Fitzroy Square, London. Join us at 7pm in the Mahatma Ghandi Room for an exciting evening with Rodriguez, to whom I have chosen to dedicate Hemp for Victory. This event is free and open to the public, and to any journalists who dare stick their head above the parapet.

THE COTTON WEARING, 4X4 DRIVING GUARDIAN READERS

Alarms went off this weekend as I leafed through the Guardian on Saturday. As usual, I could find no mention of hemp (although they did a full page feature on hemp and Hemp for Victory in September, 2006). Neither was there much mention of Muesli or sandals. The new improved Guardian was, however, awash with ads for 4x4s and other gas guzzlers. With full page ads or spreads, serious money is passing hands here. No wonder that they are printing the rather flawed science of George Monbiot and ignoring sound work by others much more qualified to take on these important issues. It seems they hardly have time to do any fact checking whatsoever, as this month they published rubbish about plans to close down the Serious Fraud Office. "There is absolutely no truth in your story," replied the Attorney General, Peter Goldsmith.

Maybe no truth, but lots of car ads, and it seems that the paper is now driven by Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Suzuki, Saab, Kia Motors, Freelander and Toyota. The Porsche people not only have an ad but a breezy editorial praising the 911. Trees are chopped down daily to promote 4x4s in this paper, which goes out of its way to call anyone questioning the US government on 9/11 a "gibbering idiot." Which, of course, includes a lot of people who work for the US government, they might look into the facts and wonder why senators, congressmen and military officers question the official story. Or they might talk to William Rodriguez, the eyewitness and hero who saved hundreds of lives by going back into the building at great risk to himself. In fact, he was interviewed by someone with a view to printing his account, but then it never appeared in print. Maybe there just wasn't room with all the 4x4 ads, promoting the automotive and mining industries, both part of or related to the military industrial complex.

So thanks, Guardian, but no thanks; next weekend I will look for another paper to read, and in fact today I found much more objective reading (and less car ads) in the Daily Mail. Two of their reporters are now questioning the so-called suicide of Dr. David Kelly, and later this week, it is expected that an interview with William Rodriguez will appear.

WILLIAM RODRIGUEZ

Last week William Rodriguez, the man who saved hundreds of lives on 9/11, was speaking in London, and we gave him a copy of Hemp for Victory, which is dedicated to him. His story, like the story of hemp, has been suppressed. Note, however, the photo left, which is indeed William Rodriguez, shaking hands with the man who so bravely defended America on 9/11 by reading a story about a pet goat... must have been a really good one. As W was reading the about the goat's splendid escapades, William was walking up the stairwells, trying to get everyone out. He could have been the first one out that morning, and he too could have read a story about a pet goat, but for some reason he decided to go into a burning building and use his master key to open the locked firedoors on each floor. For which he got a Congressional Medal of Honour, and who knows, maybe the president who presented this medal read to him some of the pet goat story. Just imagine, William could have told W a few things about what went on that day, and in return W could have said something like this: "Well you know Willy, just as you were helping the firemen to secure water and directing people to the stairwell, I got to the part about that goat stealing some children's apples. Yes, that was a good one. Too bad I was interrupted by Andrew Card at that point, but that didn't stop me. Just as you went on helping people to safety, I went on with my mission. I kept on reading."

One story that was not read at that meeting was the true story about bombs in the building and heavy machinery being secretly moved on the 34th floor. Oh no, the US government does not like those stories, because it means there are a lot of guilty goats running around the White House, some who killed 3,000 people that day in order to start a profitable war. So after initially welcoming William and putting him forward as a congressional candidate, they decided to blacklist him. "Hero Homeless" was the headline in one NY paper some months after the attacks, and the governor stepped in to help William. But not for long. His story, which is so well documented and vetted, is embarrassing to the real perpetrators and traitors who stand by W. Come hell or high water, and both did, they stood with their man, like the idiotic voters of Waterbury, Connecticut, who stood by Philip Giordano, even after he was caught using the Mayor's ofice to rape pre-teens.

William's story is being told to those who are willing to listen. The press in London boycotted him, as does the press in the US, because they are full of silly cowards, and there is always some story they'd rather print, be it Naomi Campbell or the pet goat.

But we're used to that, part of the hemp story is that William Randolph Hearst and every idiot journalist in the US blacklisted hemp and printed lies about it for years. This led to US dependency on oil, and made Saudi Arabia rich. If W was not so busy reading the tale of the goat, he might notice this.

William Rodriguez will be back in London in January 2007, when he will tell his tale to all and sundry, that is, those who are not afraid to listen. For information on this, check out the www.nineeleven.co.uk site.