Thursday, February 14, 2013

New York Times article on hemp

The New York Times yesterday (p. A16) published an article on hemp in Kentucky, after Senator Mitch McConnell joined Senator Rand Paul in his support of hemp, and after a meeting on 11 February in which the issue was debated. Kentuckians are most supportive of this, see the plethora of previous posts for the current and past history. Below, Trip Gabriel reports on the issue as follows:

Hemp Growing Finds Allies of a New Stripe in Kentucky

The Courier-Journal, via Associated Press
In the summer of 1952, hemp plants growing wild in a lot in downtown Louisville, Ky., were killed with chemical spray.
FRANKFORT, Ky. — In 1996 the actor Woody Harrelson, who has a sideline as an activist for legalizing marijuana, was arrested in Kentucky for planting four hemp seeds.       
 

 

James Crisp/Associated Press
Senator Rand Paul supports legalizing the growing of hemp in the United States.
 
John Sommers II/Reuters
Woody Harrelson in 1996.
Last month Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican minority leader, announced his support for growing hemp in Kentucky, his home state.
Between those jarringly disparate events lies the evolution of hemp from a countercultural cause to an issue championed by farmers in the heartland and conservative lawmakers.
On Monday, a panel of the Republican-controlled Kentucky State Senate unanimously approved a bill to license hemp growers. It was promoted by the state agriculture commissioner and three members of the state’s Congressional delegation, including Senator Rand Paul, who removed his jacket to testify in a white shirt that he announced was made of hemp fibers.
If the bill is approved by the full Legislature, Kentucky will join eight other states that have adopted laws to allow commercial hemp growing, although the practice is effectively blocked by federal law that makes no distinction between hemp and marijuana.
Mr. Paul, a Republican, said he would seek a waiver from the Obama administration for Kentucky hemp growers, while pressing Congress to delist hemp as a controlled substance, which hemp supporters say is a legacy of antidrug hysteria.
Both plants are the same species, Cannabis sativa, but hemp has only a trace of the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. Hemp’s champions see it as a source of agricultural jobs, an alternative for struggling tobacco farmers and a wonder plant with uses from bluejeans to building materials.
Attitudes are changing in surprising places. At a hearing on Monday in Frankfort, the Kentucky capital, the state police commissioner’s opposition to hemp growing was challenged by a former C.I.A. director, R. James Woolsey.
“The specter of people getting high on industrial hemp,” Mr. Woolsey said, “is pretty much exactly like saying you can get drunk on O’Doul’s.”
Hemp supporters say it is only a matter of time before legalization comes as people more fully understand the plant. They also point to states where voters legalized recreational marijuana in November — Colorado and Washington — as inevitably forcing a change in priorities in the Obama administration.
“The demonology of hemp is exposed as being not valid,” said Representative John Yarmuth, Democrat of Kentucky, a sponsor of a bill in the House to allow hemp cultivation. He said the movement to accept hemp has the same inevitability that he attributed to acceptance of same-sex marriage.
Still, the federal government has been unyielding. Farmers in states that allow hemp must seek a waiver from the Drug Enforcement Administration or risk being raided by federal agents and losing their farms.
Dave Monson, a North Dakota wheat farmer and Republican state representative, has held a state hemp license since 2007, when North Dakota legalized cultivation. But he has no plans to plant. “I applied for a D.E.A. license, never got one,” he said.
A spokesman for the drug agency said it did not keep statistics on permits to grow hemp, which it does not distinguish from marijuana under the Controlled Substance Act of 1970.
Mr. Monson knows farmers just north of the Canadian border who profitably grow hemp, and he argues that it can be an economic boon. “The more states that do what we have done in North Dakota, if we can keep the pressure on, I think we’re going to see some movement at the federal level,” he said.
Hemp supporters claim a total retail value of products containing hemp at more than $400 million in the United States. But a Congressional Research Service report last year found that imported hemp raw materials was small, only $11.5 million. All hemp used in United States today — such as in Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps sold at Whole Foods — is imported, mostly from China.
Rodney Brewer, the commissioner of the Kentucky State Police, said that if hemp farming were legal, marijuana growers would hide their plants in hemp fields and the police could not tell them apart.
“They are identical in appearance when it comes to the naked eye,” Mr. Brewer said, predicting that legalizing hemp would create a boom for pot growers.
But Mr. Woolsey, who said he favored hemp because of “my interest in prosperity for rural America,” argued that no pot farmer would hide plants in a hemp field for fear that low-potency hemp would cross-pollinate with marijuana and lower the concentration of THC, its psychoactive ingredient.
Marijuana growers “hate the idea of having industrial hemp anywhere near,” he said.
The Kentucky bill faces resistance from some lawmakers, including the speaker of the State House.
Mr. Paul, after calling attention to his hemp shirt at the hearing in Frankfort, seemed to roll his eyes when he said, “You’d think you’re at a D.E.A. hearing.”
“This is a hearing about a crop,” he said. “It’s a crop that’s legal everywhere else in the world except the United States.”
Mr. Paul, elected in 2010 with Tea Party support, promised to introduce a Senate bill as a companion to the pro-hemp bill in the House, which has 28 co-sponsors. He is following in the family footsteps, since the first House bill allowing hemp was introduced several years ago by his father, Ron Paul, a former Texas congressman and Republican presidential candidate. Ron Paul’s embrace of the issue fit his deep libertarian streak, which also at times embraced legalizing marijuana and other drugs.
Those positions placed hemp far outside the mainstream in many lawmakers’ minds, just as the image of its products — soaps, sandals and natural foods sold at co-ops — placed it in a counterculture.
But no better sign exists that hemp’s image is changing than its embrace by Mr. McConnell, the minority leader, who said in a statement last month that his mind had been changed “after long discussions” with Rand Paul and the Kentucky agriculture commissioner, James Comer, a Republican.
“The utilization of hemp to produce everything from clothing to paper is real,” Mr. McConnell said.

7 comments:

Carlos said...

This article is so lacking in any basic context that it makes most people think it is some esoteric issue of a pothead issue - it says Woody Harrelson is a pot activist, he is actually much a hemp, that is industrial hemp, activist, he did write the foreword to the book "Hemp for Victory" by Kenyon Gibson recently, and is not just for smoking it as the article allows the reader to believe.
The NYT did not do much research! There are much better pieces in the Guardian, LA Times, etc. But even these papers need to write more recent pieces, that is, if they cared.

GOPbuster said...

Yes, the NYT really did not justice to the issue. Why a photo of hemp being destroyed in a ditch with chemicals? Why not some insight into the US companies like Minawear that are selling hemp items?
And no mention of the petition to the White House at www.minawear.com/abou-us/

GOPbuster said...

That was www.minawear.com/about-us

Mark Ski said...

Newspapers used to be made of hemp paper, then the Hearst empire started using trees, real reason for anti-hemp laws? To make room for tree based pulp for Hearst papers. What is the NYT using? Not hemp I assure you. And they know so little about the issue. Makes one wonder...

Unknown said...

The consensus from these comments and emails I have been getting is that the reporter really had no clue about the issue. Some seem to think this is my fault as I live in NYC and would therefore have some influence with the NYT. Not so. They have been contacted by me for many years, and as with many issues, they disregard the key people in the movement. They then send a reporter who ignores the facts. Not only with hemp, but with many other issues.
It is sad, however, I hope to see them write a lenthtier piece and do justice to this issue. Americans need hemp and have a historical right to it. The newspapers in this country, maybe not the NYT, but certainly the Hearst papers, screwed the people over when WR Hearst wanted to use tree pulp for paper.
The people must put pressure on the papers and get them to report fully and honestly on this issue or the US will not make hemp legal, there will continue to be economic distress, and things will get worse all around.
I did send in a letter to the NYT two days after this article appeared, pointing out the lack of facts and asking that they commission another piece.
I would ask the reader here to help with this, call or write the NYT and let's get this done.
Here are some contact details:
212 556 7652 public editor
212 556 1831 op ed submissions
212 556 1234 main switchboard
letters@nytimes.com
public@nytimes.com
publisher@nytimes.com
ceo@nytimes.com

Unknown said...

The consensus from these comments and emails I have been getting is that the reporter really had no clue about the issue. Some seem to think this is my fault as I live in NYC and would therefore have some influence with the NYT. Not so. They have been contacted by me for many years, and as with many issues, they disregard the key people in the movement. They then send a reporter who ignores the facts. Not only with hemp, but with many other issues.
It is sad, however, I hope to see them write a lenthtier piece and do justice to this issue. Americans need hemp and have a historical right to it. The newspapers in this country, maybe not the NYT, but certainly the Hearst papers, screwed the people over when WR Hearst wanted to use tree pulp for paper.
The people must put pressure on the papers and get them to report fully and honestly on this issue or the US will not make hemp legal, there will continue to be economic distress, and things will get worse all around.
I did send in a letter to the NYT two days after this article appeared, pointing out the lack of facts and asking that they commission another piece.
I would ask the reader here to help with this, call or write the NYT and let's get this done.
Here are some contact details:
212 556 7652 public editor
212 556 1831 op ed submissions
212 556 1234 main switchboard
letters@nytimes.com
public@nytimes.com
publisher@nytimes.com
ceo@nytimes.com

Phil Telic said...

And what has the NYT said about this issue since? With all of its resources one would expect something out of them, especially given the importance of the hemp issue. JOBS. RAW MATERIALS. CLEAN ENVIRONMENT.
Now an issue in NYC is plastic bags, and this could be resolved by using hemp string bags - grown and made in America. (One source of hemp stems for string could be pot growers donating the stems...)
Then the used bags, they are used for weeks each one before they are worn out - could be recycled into paper. Simple. Made in the USA.
And as Mark noted, newspapers used to be made of hemp paper.